How Goob from "Meet the Robinsons" became a watch

One of my favorite animated characters is Goob from Walt Disney Animation Studios' “Meet the Robinsons”.  I think it’s one of Disney’s most underrated films, and there’s really no synopsis that does the movie justice, but if you haven’t seen it, I highly recommend that you do.  Goob, whose actual name is Michael Yagoobian, is one of the little boys in the movie.  He plays a bigger part than that in the film, but that would be giving you spoilers if you haven't seen the film.  In any case, I thought Goob was such a cute little kid, and he just got some really unlucky breaks in life, and I felt bad for him.  I wanted to introduce him to Boo from Pixar’s “Monsters, Inc.” (she’s also one of my favorite animated characters), and they could have adventures together, and she could teach him how to have fun, and I think she would be a good influence on him.  I looked for some merchandise with him on it, but because of how the story develops, the little boy is not in much of the film, and they couldn’t really market him without giving some of the story away.  There were certainly no figurines or plush of him, and as I recall, the only thing I found was a roll of stickers for the movie, and it happened to have the occasional sticker with him, so I bought that.

OK, so, that’s one part of the backstory.

I don’t remember exactly when it was (The movie was released in 2007, so it had to be sometime after that.),but for my birthday one year, the husband came to me and said that he had a gift planned for me, but he didn’t have it yet, and he wasn’t sure that he would actually be able to get it, and if he did, he had no idea when it might be available, and did I want to know what it was or just wait to see if it happened.  Ummm, ok.  I decided I would just wait without knowing what it was I might be waiting for.

Some months later, he was excited to tell me that the gift he wanted had indeed arrived, and he gave me a watch with Goob on it.

Now, here’s the second part of the backstory.

There’s a watch store on Main Street at Disneyland, and as you can imagine, they have all kinds of nice things in there.  I don’t know if they still have them now, but they used to have original artwork watches for sale, some of which were designs that you could choose from a book and some of which might be released for special occasions, like an anniversary of an attraction or for Disneyland's birthday.  If you purchased any of these original artwork watches, you also got the artwork drawing with it.  I know they don’t have this now, but back then, you could also get a custom watch with a design that wasn’t in the book, but there was a whole process of getting the design approved before they could make the watch.  That’s what the husband did to get this watch made, but there was a glitch.  “Meet the Robinsons” was a computer-animated film from Walt Disney Animation Studios.  The husband was told by a cast member at the watch shop that they had a contact to ask for approval for Walt Disney Animation movies that were hand-drawn, and they had a contact to ask for approval for Pixar Studios, who only made computer-animated movies, but because Walt Disney Animation Studios had not made many computer-animated films, this was the first time someone had requested a watch with a design from one of those films, so they had not yet created an approval process for that.  The husband was told that once they figured out who needed to approve the design request, and if the request was approved or not, they would call him back to let him know, but they had no way of knowing how long that would take.

So he waited.  I don’t know how long it took, but he said that eventually, he got a call back saying his request had been approved.  He had given them a screenshot he’d taken of the design he wanted.  My two favorite bits with Goob are both when he’s in his baseball uniform.  At one point, he has a juice box, and he’s trying to drink out of it, but I think the straw moves around.  In a later scene, after Goob has a black eye, he has a steak over that eye, and I absolutely love his line:  “Mr. Steak, you’re my only friend.”  The husband had given them the design with Goob and the juice box.  Once his request was approved, they had one of the artists do a drawing of the picture, which they then sent to the husband for approval.  Once a drawing was approved, then they proceeded to make the watch.

Here's the awesome Goob watch.  The detail is amazing, with the logo on the hat, and the dinosaur on his shirt, and his sleepy eyes with dark shadows under them because the poor boy is so exhausted, and the juice box and the little straw in his mouth.

They finally called the husband to let him know that the watch was ready, so he went by to pick it up.  As it happened, the artist who did the drawing for the watch, Dave Smith (but not the Walt Disney Archives' Dave Smith), was there at the watch shop that night, so the husband stopped by to tell him he was picking up the watch.  The husband said that Dave was happy to meet him and said that he really enjoyed drawing Goob and that many people stopped to admire his work and recognized Goob.  The artists did their work on the watch drawings out in the open, so you could see them if you were standing in the shop or just walking outside by the window.

All of the original artwork watches also came with a Mickey head buckle.  So cute.

Seriously, how cute is that little Mickey-head buckle?

So that’s the story of how I got this cute watch.  There was almost no Goob merchandise available, so the husband had to have one created for me!

"The Emperor's New Groove" - Disney animated film review

The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week was "The Emperor’s New Groove".

But first, a side note: I’ve never seen the Disney animated movie “Mulan”. It would definitely be on this to-watch list that I’m going through, but I wanted to see the live-action version first, but obviously, with its delayed release, I haven’t had a chance to do that. I don’t want to see the animated version this close to seeing the new version because I’d like to see the new film on its own merits, not in comparison to something else. So, I’m waiting until I can see the live-action version, and then some time after that, I’ll go back and see the animated version.

OK, back to last week's movie.

I will admit up front that I had serious biases against this film going in, which also accounts for the reason I’ve never seen it in the first place. I was pretty excited when I heard that they were working on a dramatic animated musical film called “Kingdom of the Sun”, especially since Sting was going to be doing the music, and I’m a Sting fan. And then, somehow, plans changed, and it wasn’t going to be called that anymore (I liked that title.), and now, it was going in a different direction, and it was now going to be a commentary, and would be called “The Emperor’s New Groove” instead. Well, it’s clear from the new title that it’s going to be a very different movie. Oh, and the lead will still be voiced by David Spade. Ugh. I am not a fan of David Spade. I am decidedly not a fan. I know many enjoy his particular flavor of comedy. I am not one of them. Have I made it clear that I do not enjoy David Spade’s brand of comedy and therefore avoid it? So, you’ve changed the animated film with Sting’s music into a comedy starring David Spade. That’s like promising me sushi and then trying to feed me dirt mixed with black licorice. (For those who don’t know, I do not like black licorice.)

Umm, yeah, no. And before any fans of David Spade try to expound the virtues of his comedy genius to me, I’m not saying he’s not talented or that he’s not funny. Many people find him one or the other or both. I’m saying *I* do not find him either, and I actually find him rather annoying, so my opinion of his work makes me not at all interested in watching him. OK?

OK, well, I tried to give the film as much of a chance going in as I could. I’ve seen films that are genres I don’t usually enjoy, and I’ve seen performers in things I don’t usually like, and in some cases, I’ve been very pleasantly surprised and actually enjoyed the film / performance. Maybe this will be one of those cases.

Yeah, no.

About 5 minutes into the film, I wanted to turn it off. I didn’t because I said I’d watch the film. I had to give it a chance.

10 - 15 minutes into the film, I *really* wanted to stop watching, and I would have if not for this little project that I’ve been engaged in. I forced myself to keep watching and mostly to keep paying attention.

Even from the very beginning of the film, Emperor Kuzco is every bit the self-centered, narcissistic, self-indulgent, unfeeling, unsympathetic, smarmy asshole that is the hallmark of David Spade’s characters that I despise. No one and nothing else matters, and he has to be the center of attention. Heck, that very sentiment is included in the plot of the story - don’t look at him, it’s my story, pay attention to me. He is a complete jerk the entire time, with zero consideration for anyone else.

Making a comparison to the prince in “Beauty and the Beast” is where I found him even more annoying. Like Kuzco, the prince was unkind and unfeeling and self-centered, and for his faults, he was turned into a beast who had to prove his worthiness to regain his life. He doesn’t know how to be nice and charming, but he tries with Belle, even though he fails many times. He learns empathy and caring and thinking of others.

On the other hand, Kuzco was accidentally turned into a llama instead of being killed, which is what rogue advisor Yzma intended when Kuzco put a stop to her attempt to usurp his position. He fired her, and in return, she wanted to kill him with poison, but her bungling assistant grabs the wrong potion instead. The entire time that Kuzco is a llama, he retains his asshole-ness, he thinks he’s just going to demand to be turned back into a human and it’ll happen, and he doesn’t change his mind about simply taking over a home and a village because he wants a summer home, and he even lies about changing his mind to the very person (Pacha) who he is kicking out of his home. He finally changes his mind at the last minute when he overhears Yzma say that she wants to find him and kill him like she’d intended, but again, his change is not because of his concern for anyone else. It’s still about him. He realizes he’s in danger, and that’s when he turns to Pacha for help. Yeah, at the end, he doesn’t take Pacha’s home and shares it instead (and apparently, that story bit is only because Sting sent a note to the production objecting to their original ending), but it’s so completely out of character for him without showing any reason for the change.

Pacha is the nice guy in town who can’t believe he’s losing his home, and he’s a family man, a husband and a dad, and he can’t bring himself to tell his wife or kids about the impending doom. And he really started to annoy me because no matter what Kuzco did or said to him, he was still nice to him and went above and beyond to help him. Dude, you’re a doormat. You don’t have to keep helping people who are consistently jerks to you.

I liked the little squirrel. I laughed when he wanted to pop the balloons so that it would awaken the panthers so that they would chase after Kuzco. I liked the panthers, and I especially liked the little baby panther.

Yzma was ok, and I enjoyed hearing her voiced by Eartha Kitt, but I wanted her to have more to do. I did think it was funny that she got turned into a little kitten.

As I continued to force myself to watch this movie, I kept thinking of “Leaving Las Vegas”. I hated that movie so much, and I really disliked Nicholas Cage’s character. I was rooting for him to die as early as possible because I knew that the movie would then be over. I had a similar feeling here. No, I didn’t root for Kuzco to die because I knew that wasn’t happening. I just wanted the plot to move along because I knew eventually, he was going to be turned back into a human and not take over Pancha’s house. The sooner that happened, the sooner the movie would be over.

Mercifully, the movie did eventually end. That’s 82 minutes of my life that I can’t get back. Wait, no, let’s say 75 minutes of my life I can’t get back. There were a few things that I did actually enjoy about the film, other than the squirrel and the panthers: 1) I liked the Tom Jones song. Of course, I’ve heard it in the context of many clips and such, but it was an inspired choice to get him to do the song. And he knocks it out of the park. 2) It happened many years ago, so I forget which runDisney race it was, but I think it was a 5K, and there was someone dressed in a costume for a race where I didn’t recognize the character. He was carrying a really tall tower on him, and he had to bend over quite a bit to get under the monorail track overhead in Downtown Disney after the race, which is where I saw him. I didn’t know until someone told me that it was a character from “The Emperor’s New Groove”, and now having seen the film, I know that it was Kronk carrying Yzma, so yeah, fantastic costume in and of itself, never mind running a race that way. And 3) They at least kept the Sting song which they played in the end credits, and I enjoyed it. And he even got an Oscar nomination for it!

So, after doing a little research, I realize that I need to find and watch the film “The Sweatbox”, which is a documentary about the making of “Kingdom of the Sun” and how it turned into “The Emperor’s New Groove’. The film was made by filmmaker Trudie Styler, who also happens to be married to Sting.

"Pocahontas" - Disney animated film review

The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week was "Pocahontas".

I was a little hesitant going into this movie. I had a basic idea of what the movie was about, and while it did follow the likely-made-up version told by the real John Smith, I did appreciate that it was more than just that.

The dynamic of the tribal chief, Pocahontas and John Smith reminded me of the “The Little Mermaid”, released 6 years prior, with regard to Triton, Ariel and Eric. That’s reinforced later with the scenes of Pocahontas’ hair blowing in the wind much like how Ariel’s hair sways in the currents of the ocean. Pocahontas being unwilling to marry her arranged to-be husband reminded me of Merida, and her great line of “I will be shooting for my own hand” in the archery contest.

There were a few plot points that were entirely too stereotypical for movies like this, with Pocahontas as the “noble savage” who falls immediately in love with the blond-hair, blue-eyed John Smith (the ONLY blond in the bunch), who means well even in his ignorance, but her love and guidance help him to see the light. I did appreciate that instead of beating around the bush, trying to couch John Smith’s superior attitude toward the “savages” in a paternalistic sense of showing the uncivilized children how adults live and behave (even though John Smith says as much), I did like the immediate kick-back from Pocahontas as she challenges not only his viewpoint but the very words he uses. Having now seen and heard “Colors of the Wind” in the context of the film, I think it’s a fantastic song that conveys Pocahontas’ scolding of John Smith’s racist viewpoint. (And to echo my earlier comparison of Pocahontas to Ariel, there’s a scene during this song where Pocahontas’ hair becomes a frozen-yogurt-swirl, just like Ariel’s did in “Under the Sea”, maybe?) I feel like “Just Around the Riverbend” is more often used in association with this film, but this song is much more representative of the spirit of the film. I’m glad “Colors of the Wind” won Best Original Song at the Oscars.

Speaking of “Just Around the Riverbend”, I never knew there was a second verse to the song. I guess I’ve never heard the song in total, only snippets in shows and such, and they only ever use the first verse and chorus.

I thought the scene near the beginning where the ship encounters dangers on the ocean with the storm was a terrific scene and very well done.

Governor Radcliffe is very much depicted as a one-note character. He’s bad, all bad, and there’s nothing good about him. When he reveals that he’s after gold and envisions that finding such gold will bring him fortune, fame, power and even a kingship back home, he reminded me of Clayton from “Tarzan”, who had his own nefarious motives as well. I did find Radcliffe’s costuming to be very interesting. While all of the sailors are in browns and dark blues, Radcliffe wears a very flamboyant outfit with multiple bright colors. He looks like he’s dressed to attend the Festival of Fools from “The Hunchback of Notre Dame”, and he’d probably give Clopin a run for his money in the costuming contest.

John Smith seemed pretty non-descript, and he looked a lot to me like the human form of the prince aka The Beast in “Beauty and the Beast”. I had forgotten that he was voiced by Mel Gibson, but I think he did a perfectly fine job.

I was a bit puzzled at the arc that involved Thomas. He’s set up as someone who’s going to play a role later because he’s the only one of the sailors that they spotlight as the ship is about to depart, so I kept expecting him to do something. Ultimately, he’s the one who kills the warrior that Pocahontas was supposed to marry, but as much of a flashpoint as that turns out to be, his involvement is brushed aside. He’s the one who actually kills him, but it’s John Smith who gets the blame and who is sentenced to death. Thomas is the culprit in the most critical event that happens in the entire movie and yet he remains in the shadows. That is, until he all of a sudden finds his voice and appears to lead the sailors in a revolt against Radcliffe. And then come to find out that Thomas is voiced by Christian Bale! Yeah, I definitely expected more out of Thomas.

One point that I absolutely hated in this film is the resolution of the language barrier. They establish that John Smith and Pocahontas speak different languages and so communication is a problem. But then, in the next minute, a wind blows in, apparently bringing with it a Universal Translator, and all of a sudden, the two are conversing perfectly easily. I understand that the language issue is one that needed to be resolved, probably fairly quickly, but this just seemed like a cheap way to do that.

One thing I really did like in the film was Meeko. I’ve known he was in the film but didn’t really know much about him other than that he’s Pocahontas’ raccoon sidekick, but he was really very cute. I loved that he was always pre-occupied with food, and I laughed as he was picking up the biscuits that John Smith was dropping. There’s also a scene later in the film where Meeko is sticking out of the top of a tree trunk and the pug is at the bottom part, and it made me think of Rocket the Raccoon! There were a few occasions when Meeko pretended to be a hat, which I also thought was funny and was a bit of morbid humour. When Meeko did that, he also reminded me of Sammy from the Country Bear Jamboree. And while Meeko is cute as can be, I’m pretty sure raccoons don’t know how to braid hair!

Radcliffe’s pug was incredibly annoying to me, even when he got converted thanks to Meeko’s intervention.

And Flit the hummingbird is completely superfluous in this film. Meeko is already the comedic sidekick, and Flit does very little to add to that, even though he is the reason John Smith is dancing around and spilling biscuits everywhere for Meeko to scoop up. I don’t know they they felt Flit was needed.

I was a bit concerned about how the film was going to end, either that Pocahontas would choose to go with John Smith, or John Smith would decide to stay, but I’m glad they resolved it the way that they did. They each went back to where they belonged. The “happily ever after” for each of them is different than what is usual in these types of movies.

And I usually don’t care for the pop versions of songs in animated films, but I think Vanessa Williams did a good job with “Colors of the Wind”. Sometimes, the pop version is too angsty or overdone, and she did neither.

"The Fox and the Hound" - Disney animated film review

The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week was "The Fox and the Hound".

I don’t have too much to say about this film. Or maybe I do. It was fine. It was mildly entertaining, but nothing stuck out for me. I didn’t love it, I didn’t hate it, and for the most part, no small beings had to endure meanness or cruelty. I didn’t have much feeling about it, which is actually worse than me hating it, because it means I didn’t care. And I didn’t really. I started getting bored about halfway through. I’ve seen it, and I don’t feel the need to see it again.

So I didn’t know anything about the film going in (are you sensing a trend?), other than that I presumed there was a fox and a dog that were the main characters, and from what little I remember about seeing pictures from it, they were both young. OK, cute animals, I can do that.

Oh, hey, there’s a cute baby animal. Being carried by his mother who is trying to find a safe place for him. She hides him, and she runs away. And then she’s shot. What the hell? Did we accidentally end up watching “Bambi” by mistake? Nope. OK, I’m not liking this beginning. So a wise old owl (Big Mama - really with the name, when the role is voiced by Pearl Bailey?) sees all this happening and realizes that the poor little fox is left all alone and wants to find someone to take care of him. Awww, how nice, compassion. She tries to enlist the help of Dinky the sparrow and Boomer the woodpecker (who I absolutely could not deal with because it’s TIGGER, as in T-I-double-guh-ER - every time he spoke, it ripped me out of the story, especially with his little laugh), and they eventually manage to get the attention of Widow Tweed, who adopts the little fox and names him Tod. Meanwhile, Widow Tweed’s neighbor Amos Slade, who is a hunter of some sort, adopts a hound puppy who he names Copper, and he expects his hunting dog Chief to train the new puppy basically to take over Chief’s job. Don’t do it, Chief. As soon as you teach him, he’s gonna kick you out.

So Tod and Copper end up meeting and playing. I thought Tod was pretty cute, but I wasn’t as keen on Copper. And they become the bestest of friends and vow to be BFFs forever. You see where this is going, right?

Amos and Chief and Copper end up pursuing Tod at one point, who sees Widow Tweed driving and jumps into her car as she’s presumably driving barrel-loads of milk to be sold. And Amos, while trying to shoot Tod, instead shoots her barrels, spilling milk everywhere. So Widow Tweed gets mad at him for shooting off his gun every which where (as she should be), but I’m thinking she ought to make him pay for the milk he wasted. And she doesn’t.

Meanwhile, Dinky and Boomer are having their own troubles, trying to catch (and presumably eat) Squeeks the caterpillar. At first, I thought he was a worm, but then I saw his little feet, thought of Disneyland’s Main Street Electrical Parade and went, ah, ok, caterpillar. I guess I could have thought of Alice in Wonderland, but I didn’t. Squeeks is pretty small. Are Dinky and Boomer going to split him? Not much of a morsel. Or are they going to fight over him? And given that they apparently spend the better part of an entire year trying to catch him, and SPOILER ALERT, fail to do so, are they starving that entire time, because we don’t see them go after anything else.

So Amos and Chief and Copper go away elsewhere so Copper can be taught to hunt, and when they return, both Tod and Copper are all grown up. And, as I predicted, Copper is in charge now and Chief is pushed to the back of the truck. See, Chief, I told you not to teach him.

Still didn’t care that much about Copper, and Tod was cuter as a baby. And the inevitable happens - Tod goes to visit his friend Copper, thinking they’re still pals, but Amos and Chief and Copper end up chasing Tod onto a bridge, and Chief ends up getting hit by a train, which Copper blames Tod for. Umm, Tod didn’t hit Chief, and Chief is the one who was pursuing him on train tracks, so it’s his own fault. I thought Chief died, but we find out later that he was only hurt with a few broken bones.
Later, after Amos once again pursues Tod to Widow Tweed’s house, she tearfully gathers Tod and drives away with him. Uh oh. I’ve got a bad feeling about this. She drives him to a game preserve in a forest and leaves him there, presumably to protect him, but hey, you’re leaving him in the wild with predators that he knows nothing about and doesn’t know how to defend himself, and he also doesn’t know how to find food for himself. And to add insult to injury, it starts to rain, and he can’t find anywhere to hide because all the hidey-holes are taken. And then somehow, Big Mama ends up meeting Vixey, a female fox (who’s name is a nickname for Vixen? really?), and of course, the first thing that crosses Big Mama’s mind is to set her up with Tod. She ends up playing matchmaker for them, and it works. I have to admit, I wasn’t paying that much attention to their frolicking.

Amos finds them and chases after them but encounters a bear instead, and Copper tries to save Amos from the bear, but he’s not doing well, until Tod comes to join the fight and help out his old friend. Tod and the bear end up falling over a waterfall into a river. We don’t know what happened to the bear, but Tod survives, and while Amos is ready to shoot him, Copper steps in front of Tod to protect him and plead for his life, presumably because Tod had saved Copper from the bear. And Amos looks and looks and softens and puts down his gun. Why? I have no idea. I don’t recall if he saw that Tod saved Copper, but he was damn well ready to shoot Tod anyway. And because Copper is standing there, he gives in? Why wouldn’t he just shoo Copper out of the way and yell and scream at him about why he’s blocking his shot? I don’t know. It didn’t make much sense to me. So he walked away. Is he no longer going to be a hunter? Is he just not going to hunt Tod? Is he just not hunting Tod this time but next time, Tod is fair game? Again, I don’t know.

Meanwhile, elsewhere, Squeeks eventually turns into a butterfly (as I figured it would), which confounds Dinky and Boomer, who watch dumbfounded as Squeeks flies away, and I guess Dinky and Boomer are going to continue starving.

And, since Amos is hurt, Widow Tweed inexplicably goes to help him, and they bicker and argue, which of course means that they’re going to become a couple. Yeah, whatever, I don’t care.
So after all that, because Tod saved Copper and Copper saved Tod, they become best friends again, right? Ummm, no, that’s not what I got. Copper is still a hunting dog, and Tod is going to live a happy life with his girlfriend Vixey, with this giant literal chasm between Tod and Copper.

OK.

It was interesting to hear Mickey Rooney as Tod and Kurt Russell as Copper. I laughed when I saw Corey Feldman as the voice of young Copper. I think my favorite voice performance was Pearl Bailey. I liked her soothing tone, though I didn’t care for any of the songs.

"Dumbo" - Disney animated film review

The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week was "Dumbo". I knew a little bit about the film in that Dumbo was a baby elephant in a circus who was separated from his mother. There’s apparently much more to the story.

Having now watched 6 Disney animated films in as many weeks, I’ve come to the conclusion that all of these “kids’ movies” contain some very mature themes that aren’t necessarily easy to explain to kids. I’m finding that I’m having a lot of trouble watching when people (with “people” intending to mean humans, animals, creatures, any sentient being) are mean to others, most especially children (again, with “children” intending to mean humans, animals, creatures, whatever offspring or tiny being). There is generally an awful lot of peril involved. Are kids traumatized when they see these movies? Or is everything ok for them by the time it’s over because of the happy endings, and they’ve forgotten about all the scary things that have happened? Or are kids so young at the time they first see these that they don’t really understand what’s going on in the story and are only drawn to the cute creatures and pretty colors?

OK, so, to the movie. I liked the storks song as they were all dropping off the little babies. I was thinking wow, they have really good aim to know when to release the little bundle at what trajectory to land precisely where they need to. As I was watching that sequence, I thought of the Pixar short “Partly Cloudy”, where all babies are created in the clouds and storks deliver them to their parents. As it turns out, the creator of the short film, Peter Sohn, apparently was inspired to make the film because he watched “Dumbo” as a kid and wondered where the storks got the babies!

Awww, baby hippo! So cute. (Shout out to my friend who likes hippos.)

I really liked the Casey, Jr. segment. Terrific song, really pretty visuals. And I was marveling the whole time that they were able to create that attraction at Disneyland. Absolutely inspired and amazing. I think I had a vague idea that the attraction was linked to “Dumbo”, but I’m not sure.
We saw the other babies being delivered, and Mrs. Jumbo (Is there a Mr. Jumbo?) was eagerly awaiting her delivery, only to be disappointed when none arrives. Turns out, the stork who was delivering Dumbo was late, or at least had a later call time. The stork is able to locate Casey, Jr. (I told the husband that I didn’t know the names of the states are visible when you’re that high up. He rightly ignored my comment.) and delivers the precious package to a delighted Mrs. Jumbo.

Oh my goodness. Baby Dumbo is the cutest thing. He has an ultra version of the expressive baby eyes, and they’re a brilliant blue to boot. So pretty. I was realizing that unlike some of the other animated movies (like “Bambi” and “The Lion King”), the timeframe of this story is so short that Dumbo remains his ever-cute self since he doesn’t have time to grow up. That makes him even more endearing, always remaining a baby.

So there’s little cute Dumbo, and then, there are his EARS. Yep, he has giant ears, each of which is bigger than his head. Yeah, it looks a bit odd, but it’s not like they’re deformed or anything, like a pig’s ear that a dog has chewed up. The reaction to Dumbo’s ears made me think of Rudolph and his bright shining nose. “Dumbo” was released in 1941, and the original Rudolph story was published in a booklet in 1939, so it’s possible there was some influence.

As the entourage arrive at a new town, I was kind of watching in amazement as all the animals are so happy, happy enough to even help with putting up the tent that will be their workspace. The elephants seemed to be doing the majority of the work, with a bit of help from other animals. I noted that the tigers were not being made to help with the work, and the husband responded that they would eat everyone. Hmmm, point taken but still.

Little Dumbo is a hit with the circus guests, but then of course, some obnoxious boys have to make fun of him and even go past the ropes and taunt and harass and abuse poor little Dumbo. Stupid boys. Well, of course, mama Jumbo is going to get mad - don’t mess with her baby! But no one ever pays attention to the whole story, and the dangerous “mad elephant” is put in chains and solitary confinement, away from her little boy. Poor little baby is all alone, so maybe the other elephants will take care of him, especially since they’re female? Nope. One calls him a freak and they make fun of him, this little baby who now has no one to look after him. The female elephants behave like completely bitchy mean girls, shutting him out of their circle.

And then, one of my new favorite characters showed up - Timothy Mouse! I liked him from the very beginning, with his smart-ass voice and wisecracks, and FINALLY, someone other than Dumbo’s mother shows some compassion for the poor kid. Right away, Timothy understands how mean the female elephants are being to Dumbo, and he sets out for a little revenge by scaring them since they’re afraid of mice! And Timothy is the one with the idea of giving Dumbo a bigger and more prominent position in the circus. I do have one unanswered question about Timothy, though. What does he do? Is he employed by the circus as another animal act? He’s wearing a ringmaster costume. Or is he just hanging about, stealing peanuts, and he likes to dress fancy for no apparent reason?

I loved the term “pyramid of pachyderms”. That needs to be a band name. Or a restaurant name. Or something. But as the elephants were assembling their “pyramid” (it didn’t really look like a pyramid to me) by piling on each other like cheerleaders in a competition, I kept remarking that I didn’t think elephants could really do that, and they wouldn’t be able to hold the weight of another elephant on them, much less multiple elephants. Again, the husband ignored my comments.

When the elephants fell, I did worry about them, that they’d get hurt and die. I mean, one elephant height to fall from is bad enough, but multiple elephant heights? Yeesh. But they only came away with bumps and bruises and scrapes. I did laugh when I noticed one elephant had a steak tied over one eye. But then I stopped feeling sorry for them because they were again mean to Dumbo and kicked him out of the elephant union, so then Dumbo was used as part of the clowns act. I am not a fan of clowns. After that entire sequence, I am still not a fan of clowns.

Ahhh, Baby Mine. That devastating song that I didn’t even know how heartbreaking it is. It’s a beautiful sequence, with poor little sad Dumbo, but Timothy knows what to do to make him feel better. See, I like Timothy even more! Even though Mrs. Jumbo is caged and chained, she does her best to comfort her little boy, and Dumbo gets some much needed love from mama. Awwwww.

The clowns decide that they’re fantastic contributions to society and don’t have a problem dropping Dumbo from the top of the Empire State Building (ok, that might be an exaggeration) because after all, elephants don’t have feelings (that is most definitely NOT an exaggeration). People suck. And in this case, I do mean humans - these clowns, the boys who taunted and abused Dumbo before, and the ringmaster too.

So the clowns were celebrating and ended up dumping some of the champagne into a giant bucket of water, which eventually both Dumbo and Timothy drink out of. And they get DRUNK. Is that possible? I mean, it’s only champagne, and it’s not a lot, and it’s diluted. Do elephants and mice get drunk from champagne? I don’t know how old Timothy is, but Dumbo is just a baby. Giving champagne to the baby, even by accident, is not a good thing. I did like the sequence where Dumbo and Timothy are blowing bubbles. That was very cute and well done.

And then, my head exploded a little bit. Ummm, wait, I’ve seen this segment before, at least parts of it. You mean the entire weirdo colored elephants section of the prior incarnation of Fantasmic at Disneyland is from “Dumbo”? I had no idea. Flabbergasted.

On a different note, that segment reminded me of heffalumps and woozles from Winnie the Pooh. It appears that the existence of heffalumps and woozles pre-dates “Dumbo”, but the visual incarnation of them that we’re familiar with comes later, so I wonder if they were influenced by this segment in “Dumbo”. They’re both sort of “fever dreams” influenced by ingestion of an outside substance, kind of like an absinthe-induced hallucination. My favorite part of this segment were the pink and purple silhouettes of elephants dancing. I think that would be a really beautiful cel.

Magpies? Crows? I think one of them called themselves crows. I really liked them. They’re hip and musical and fun and a bit mischievous. I’d like to hang out with them. Without the cigar smoking, though. And they’re sarcastic and rascally at first, but then they help Dumbo learn to fly!

And then we get to the part of the story that everyone knows, where Dumbo flies, and he’s a hit, and his mom is released from jail, and they get a fancy car, and everyone is happy and loves them, now that his formerly shunned abnormal feature is now suddenly beloved because it’s serving a useful purpose. Kind of like in Rudolph’s case too. Hmmm. I kind of expected more after that, so I was surprised the “happily ever after” was rolled out so quickly, and then it was over.

I did enjoy the film for the most part, other than the whole “be mean to the poor little orphan-ish elephant just because he’s a little different” part. So at the end, when everyone’s happy and cheering for Dumbo and Mrs. Jumbo, including the female elephants, I immediately said, no, you don’t get off that easy. Oh sure, now you’re all happy and nice. You weren’t when it counted. Yeah, I hold grudges. I probably wouldn’t object to seeing the film again and just enjoy cute little Dumbo and the parts that I really liked.

And no, I will not watch the recent “live action” remake of this film.

"Lilo & Stitch" - Disney animated film review

The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week was "Lilo & Stitch".

I knew a little bit about the plot of the movie but not much, other than that Stitch was an alien creature who little Lilo adopts as her “dog”. Part of my interest in finally seeing the film is that there’s a segment in the Disneyland show “Mickey and the Magical Map” that utilizes the song “Hawaiian Roller Coaster Ride”, and I really enjoy that entire sequence.

Generally, I enjoyed the film, even though I thought there were a lot of unanswered questions. I did find myself mostly uninterested in the aliens as a whole, maybe because for the most part, we never got to know them, and they were just a roll-call of different-looking creatures. I actually did like the mad scientist in the very early part of the film, but then I think his character stagnated.

I didn’t really find myself engaged in the film until Lilo shows up. She’s definitely cute, but I think there’s a lot that we don’t know about her. I would have actually liked to have known about her parents a little earlier. We obviously know something is up since she lives only with her sister Nani, and the social worker comes to check on them to make an assessment. The picture under her pillow is very sweet, but again, I would have liked to have known earlier. Also, they never come right out and say it, but it seems they were all in a car accident, and the parents were killed but Lilo and her sister survived? That would sort of explain her acting out, being late to rehearsal, not getting along with the other kids, getting overly physical with the one other girl, but the connection is never made between those events. At one point, Nani says to Lilo about the other kids, they don’t know what to say to you. Because of her parents’ death? Or because Lilo has some eccentric interests and thoughts that the other kids find weird? I don’t think it’s clear why Lilo doesn’t have any friends. Also, sometimes, she treats them like she doesn’t care about them at all, and then other times, she wants to be part of their group, and she refers to them as her “friends”, but there isn’t any instance shown when I would consider them remotely friends. I’m also wondering about the socio-economic ramifications of their interaction. At one point, the girls are playing with dolls which are obviously store-bought, and when Lilo pulls out her home-made doll, the girls recoil in horror. One thing that was funny is that at the beginning of the film, I’m watching, and then I’m startled when I notice a fish swimming by with what looks like a sandwich. Ummm, ok, weird. And then later, Lilo explains that she gives him a peanut butter sandwich every week. And my brain goes to: 1) How does the fish hold a sandwich? 2) How does the bread stay intact and not get soggy given that it’s plunged in water? 3) How did Lilo discover that the fish liked peanut butter? 4) Smooth peanut butter or chunky peanut butter? 5) Given Lilo’s affinity for Elvis Presley, wouldn’t she be giving the fish a peanut butter and banana sandwich? Or maybe fishie is allergic to banana? 5) Well, of course you can’t give him a tuna sandwich - that would be cannibalism!

I liked seeing the interaction between Nani and Lilo, and it was heartbreaking when Nani says she likes being her sister more than she likes being her mother. The accident must have happened not that long ago because Lilo doesn’t look that much different than she does in the picture under her pillow. And now, Nani, who’s not that old herself, has to figure out how to take care of Lilo as well.

I was really thrown off by the social worker. I never got comfortable with who he was, even though he’s eventually explained to be a former CIA agent. I kept waiting for something else to happen, like he’s part of some bigger secret thing, or maybe it turns out that he’s an alien as well. It was funny to discover that he’s the one who started the story that Earth is a protected planet because of the mosquitoes. I was trying to figure out who the voice was, and it had a bit of James Earl Jones quality but not exactly. Turns out it was Ving Rhames. Ahhh, makes sense then.

Quick note on the councilwoman - I was trying to figure out who was doing her voice, and it did have a Helen Mirren quality to it, but it turned out to be someone I’m not familiar with.

The best part of the film, obviously, is Stitch. He undergoes quite good character progression. He’s pretty rabid at the beginning of the film, but he does show himself to be very resourceful in his escape, and we’re told early on that he’s smart and super strong and learns very quickly, all in the service of being as destructive as possible. (Why would someone create a creature like that, whose sole purpose is to destroy? I guess because he’s a mad scientist.) You mostly see Stitch in his four-legged form, so I forgot that I’ve actually seen pictures of him in his six-legged form. When he pulled in the two legs, OUCHHHHHH, said my brain. It’s funny but appropriate that everyone else reacts to Stitch’s odd appearance, but Lilo completely accepts him as a dog, notwithstanding him doing many decidedly non-dog things. The thing that endeared me the most about Stitch is when he created San Francisco and then proceeded to Godzilla his way through it. Ahhhh, a dog ... ummm, extraterrestrial, after my own heart. And really, you can’t get more destructive than Godzilla. In addition to his character development through story, I think they did a really good job in his design. He’s definitely got the quintessential baby-like big eyes, which are very expressive, and he also uses his ears like a cat or dog to express emotion as well. Mischievous but endearing - what’s not to love? The only thing I didn’t like about Stitch was his speaking voice. I was fine with his laugh and sounds and such, but the talking voice just didn’t work for me.

I did catch the tribute to “Mulan”, a film released 4 years prior - the name of restaurant is called Mulan Wok. There is apparently also a poster of Mulan in Lilo’s bedroom, but I didn’t see that.

I absolutely *loved* the running gag with the tourist who keeps dropping his mint chocolate chip ice cream. And because mint chocolate chip is one of my favorite ice cream flavors, it kept making me want some.  [So we went grocery shopping yesterday.  And yes, I bought some mint chocolate chip ice cream.]

And I now understand why they add Elvis to Lilo and Stitch on the surfboard at it’s a small world during Christmas time.

I would definitely watch this movie again, mostly because Stitch is a lot of fun, and I liked watching Lilo too. Next time, maybe I’ll like the aliens better and maybe I won’t be as suspicious of Mr. Bubbles.

And now that I'm caught up in real time to my viewing schedule, I will post a review every Tuesday of the Disney animated film that I watched for the first time the prior week.  Thanks!

"The Rescuers" - Disney animated film review

The next Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time was "The Rescuers".


So, you know how sometimes, when I write reviews, I go off on tangents, and the review ends up being half about the film/TV show and half about random other stuff? Yeah, that.

I knew almost nothing about the movie going in. I knew there were two mice dressed in clothing, and a vague memory of seeing a snippet of them sitting inside a leaf bobbing along in the water. I think it might have also been a Walt Disney Classics piece that I’ve seen?

I always love seeing the credits on the older animated films to see what names I recognize because they’ve gone on to do other things since then.

Frank Thomas and Ollie Johnston! Don Bluth and Gary Goldman! GLEN KEANE!!!!!

During the credits at the beginning of the film, when they had the beautiful painted backgrounds, the husband made a comment about making still paintings seem like you’re watching a film. I responded that it wasn’t new to me. I’ve seen the 1962 French short film called “La Jetée”, which utilizes almost entirely still photographs, and it’s the movement of the camera and composition and framing that makes the pictures seem to come to life. I was amused at the time when I heard that the then-forthcoming film “Twelve Monkeys” was inspired by that short. I’ve meant to see the film but haven’t gotten around to it. OK, sorry, film geek digression there.

I absolutely *loved* the parallel mouse contingent when the members of the United Nations gathered. A mouse in a kilt! So dang cute!!!!! So apparently, all the international mice are part of a Rescue Aid Society who help people and/or other animals - I’m not clear on their client base. The origin of their helpfulness seems to stem from a mouse pulling a thorn from a lion’s paw, which is depicted in a picture on the wall. Except that it’s actually a hybrid of two of Aesop’s fables, The Lion and the Mouse (wherein a mouse convinces a lion not to eat him and then later returns the favor of saving the life of the lion by chewing through the ropes that imprison him), and Androcles (wherein the slave Androcles escapes and then helps a lion with an infected paw by pulling a thorn out, and when Androcles is recaptured and thrown to the lions presumably to his death, it’s the same lion, who remembers him, and instead of killing him, is friendly to him).

One of the delegates arrives late to take her seat, and she’s a head turner. How perfect that Miss Bianca is from Hungary, given that she’s voiced by Eva Gabor. (I can apparently now cross “watch all the Disney animated films that Eva Gabor provided a voice for” off my list.) I enjoyed her performance in this film, though she was also a flirt, like Duchess was in “The Aristocats”. I’m sensing a pattern.

I’m not sure that I would have figured out that Bernard was voiced by Bob Newhart, but I really enjoyed his performance. I’m a fan of his anyway, but his calm, slightly uncertain but steady and endearing portrayal of Bernard was a lot of fun.

The scouts were really cute too. When they came on screen, the husband said, “Boy scouts!” I said, “No, mouse scouts.” And then, they were referred to as mouse scouts in the film. Nailed it!

And then it’s revealed why the Society has been convened. They’ve found a note written by a little girl named Penny, addressed to the orphanage where she lived, and she needs help. Miss Bianca volunteers to take on this mission and recruits Bernard to assist her.

OK, so far, we’ve had these little cute mice all dressed up in clothing of different countries, a little flirtation between Miss Bianca and Bernard, and then, we’re going to accompany them on an adventure. Swell. What’s next? How about ripping your heart out? Penny is a cute little girl (who reminded me of Pippi Longstocking in looks, with the red hair and pigtails, but definitely not in demeanor). Who lives in an orphanage. And it was adoption day. And she had the hope of being adopted, but the parents picked someone else. And she’s sitting on her bed, sad, because she wasn’t chosen, because the girl they picked was prettier, she tells Rufus the cat. WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Oh my gosh, how sad. Poor little girl. How did we get here? (Yes, we saw a glimpse of her earlier in the film, but we didn’t know anything about her.) And then, we find out that she was kidnapped, for what nefarious reason, we do not know yet. Oh, great, this gets better. Orphan child, in peril. Seriously, I almost turned off the movie at this point.

So then, we find out the culprit is a proprietor down the street. And her name is Medusa. Oh, giant blaring warning horn there. Clearly, she’s a villain. She can’t be a loving grandmotherly type with THAT name! So Miss Bianca and Bernard poke around Medusa’s pawn shop (that’s a hint too, right, since pawn shops aren’t necessarily regarded as upstanding places of business – if it had been Medusa’s hair salon or Medusa’s house of pets, she might have been given a smidgen of the benefit of the doubt) to see what they can find out. Notice the calendar on the wall says Thursday the 12th? What comes after that? Ooooo, spooky.

We’re then introduced to Madame Medusa. Who looks a lot like Cruella DeVille from “One Hundred and One Dalmatians”, released 16 years prior. No, really, she REALLY looks like Cruella. Like Cruella 2.0. Or possibly Cruella 1.1. The hair, the face, the body shape, even the car, and she even puts on a coat that looks like Cruella’s. It’s like she was a reincarnation of Cruella.

So then Miss Bianca and Bernard overhear Cruella ... I mean, Medusa ... talk about a girl getting away and that she needs to go to Devil’s Bayou to straighten things out. Miss Bianca and Bernard then hitch a ride with her to the airport, where we see more evidence of Bernard’s superstitious nature. Earlier, when he was climbing the ladder to get to the top of the bottle to retrieve Penny’s note, he was frightened upon realizing that the ladder had 13 steps. Here, he’s also dismayed to discover that the ramp to their airport terminal also has 13 steps, and he’s not happy when he’s told that Flight 13 is the one they need to get where they need to go. I enjoyed their adventures with Captain Orville.

When we get to Devil’s Bayou, we find out that Medusa and her sidekick Mr. Snoops have imprisoned poor little Penny on a boat that looks like the Mark Twain at Disneyland, except that it has a side paddle wheel rather than a rear paddle wheel. Medusa has henchmen in the form of alligators named Nero and Brutus (ahh, more bad guy names), and they seem to have been the inspiration for Ursula’s henchmen eels named Flotsam and Jetsam in “The Little Mermaid”. Very similar depiction and characterization, though the gators don’t speak, but the look of the eyes and snouts were very reminiscent.

After Penny escapes, the gators retrieve her and her teddy and bring them back to the boat, while Miss Bianca and Bernard enlist the help of Evinrude the dragonfly to save Penny. I really liked the sequence where Miss Bianca and Bernard are trying to evade capture and ingestion by the gators, though I did find the gator playing the organ to force out the hiding mice to be a bit weird. They had been mostly doing gator-like things, with the exception of that. When it’s revealed that Medusa is afraid of mice, the husband commented that he thought it was funny that she’s perfectly fine with the ginormous scary alligators but she’s afraid of little mice. And Evinrude has not escaped danger either, as he’s feverishly chased by a huge swarm of hungry bats intent on making him a snack morsel. That was a pretty scary segment, with the bats and their fangs and the rabid look in their eyes. After Evinrude eventually evades the bats, he is tasked by Miss Bianca and Bernard to return to Ellie Mae to ask for help. In addition to other bayou mice, Ellie Mae has also gathered together other animals to help, though I had a bit of a problem with the rabbit and the turtle and the owl all seemingly the same size as the mice. Ummm, scale issues? Anyway, the gang heads off to help save Penny from Medusa.

So, speaking of Medusa, it’s not bad enough that she kidnapped an orphan girl and transported her across state lines, but it’s revealed that she’s using Penny to retrieve the Devil’s Eye, the largest diamond in the world that’s lost somewhere in a pirates treasure cove. Penny asks to be taken back to the orphanage, and Medusa, trying to act nice to her, asks her if she doesn’t like it there, with all the room on the boat to herself, and Penny says that if she doesn’t go back to the orphanage, then she’ll never be adopted. And Medusa tells her that no one would want her. Again, WHAT??!??!?!?!?!?!??! Seriously, how cruel can you be? I generally have more problems with this kind of thing than when there’s sorcery involved, like with the Evil Queen or Maleficent. In the case of Madame Tremain in Cinderella and Madame Medusa here, they’re just normal people with evil, cruel, mean dispositions. That bothers me so much more. So apparently, Medusa sought out Penny because she’s small enough to fit in a bucket and be lowered down to look for the diamond. There are other diamonds and jewels there, some of which Penny has previously retrieved, but that’s not enough for Medusa - she wants the Devil’s Eye. When Penny is reluctant to go down in the hole because it’s dark and scary, Medusa snatches teddy away from her and basically holds him hostage in exchange for her finding the diamond. Medusa, evil, through and through.

Miss Bianca and Bernard go along with Penny, and they’re the ones who eventually find the diamond, hidden inside a skull, and they help Penny get it out of the skull. But there’s some hole at the bottom of the cave from which water erupts, periodically flooding the cave. So yeah, Medusa doesn’t care that she’s sending an orphan girl into these dangerous conditions, and she’s impatient to boot that Penny isn’t finding the diamond fast enough. Once Penny obtains the diamond and is pulled back up, Medusa proves herself to be even worse by double-crossing Snoops, to whom she had promised half the loot but she’s now reneging on that deal. She also does not follow through on her promise to return teddy to Penny in exchange for the diamond (How many strikes is that against her now?), but her escape is thwarted by the arrival of Ellie Mae and her gang. We discover that Medusa didn’t want to give up teddy because she’d hidden the Devil’s Eye inside. Penny retrieves teddy, and she’s returned to safety, the diamond is put on display at the Smithsonian, and Penny gets adopted and expresses thanks to Miss Bianca, Bernard and everyone else who helped to save her. This poor girl deserves a happy life.

After their good deed, Miss Bianca and Bernard are on to their next adventure, with Orville and Evinrude along. Evinrude in the scarf and knit cap – oh my gosh, how darn cute is he?

Generally, I enjoyed the film, though I was really bothered by Penny’s plight. It seems a pretty heavy story for a “kids film”. I mean, she gets a happy ending, but not before being an orphan, being rejected, being kidnapped, being told that no one wants her, and then having her life put in danger because she’s viewed as less important than what is essentially a lump of coal. I would watch this film again, and maybe next time, because I know it turns out ok, it won’t bother me as much, but the look on little Penny’s face when Medusa tells her no one wants her – ugh, so heartbreaking. Side note that I learned reading background today – the girl who voiced Penny eventually went on to be in the movie "Airplane", and she’s the one who says she likes her coffee black.... How funny is that?

I was perplexed, though, that Bernard’s seeming preoccupation with superstition was never resolved. I figured he’d have some major obstacle to overcome, especially since they were going to the Devil’s Bayou, and eventually were tasked with helping to retrieve the Devil’s Eye, but nothing ever arose. I’m not sure why that whole side story was included.

A little note about the few songs in the movie – yeah, none of them did anything for me.

"Hercules" - Disney animated film review

This week’s Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time was "Hercules". Even though I hadn’t seen the film, I was a little familiar with some aspects of this version of the story because Disneyland had a daytime parade that I believe commenced concurrent with the release of the film. I absolutely loved that parade, even with not having seen the film. It was bright and energetic and fun. I watched that parade many times and never got tired of it. Because I’d enjoyed the parade so much, I was looking forward to seeing the film, but it wasn’t quite the journey I expected.

My initial emotion early on in the film was confusion. Yay, there’s a baby boy, and he’s so loved by his mom and his dad, Zeus, king of the gods. Wait, hold the farm. Yeah, dad Zeus was excited about the baby, but his wife? Umm, no, Hera was PISSED because Hercules was the product of an affair that Zeus had with a human. Hera HATED Hercules and regularly tried to cause him great harm and grief. The story of the film completely abandons that particular story point, but it ended up bothering me quite a bit every time there was something said or shown about how much “mom” missed, loved and worried about her baby. I’m trying to remember if Hera is named in this film or if she’s just referred to as “Zeus’ wife”. I did notice that while Zeus was drawn with very much detail, Hera was fairly bland, very deferring and timid. Yeah, soooooo not Hera.

There were aspects of the film that I thought were more frightening than I’d have expected for a film with a large target audience of young children. I thought the Fates were a bit scary, especially with the notion that they only had to cut a string to end your life, and the joy with which they seemed to do it. I did think the Hydra was pretty cool, even if a bit terrifying, especially as it continued to grow multiple heads. When Hercules first started fighting it, I couldn’t even tell if it was supposed to be a Hydra. I said something to the husband about it not having enough heads, and the husband said to wait, this was only Hydra 1.0.

When the part of the story came up about the planets lining up and how that would give Hades the power to release the Titans, it completely made me think of "Thor: Dark World", how the alignment of the Nine Realms was going to wreak havoc upon the universe. For a second, I wondered how the Dark Elves were going to show up, but, spoiler alert, they didn’t. Hercules vs. Dark Elves will have to wait for another crossover event.

Generally, I thought the film was fine, but that was it. Yeah, it was ok. Just ok. Nothing really jumped out at me. I did notice that I was losing interest in parts and had to make myself keep paying attention. I was surprised that baby Hercules was not as cute as I expected him to be. Disney has a thing about how they draw adorable babies, and Hercules was not that. Maybe cause he’s supposed to be muscular and strong? Baby Pegasus, though, was just as cute as I’d seen him as a plush toy.

One thing that really surprised me was that I was completely not into the Muses. They were one of my favorite parts of the parade. I absolutely loved them, and sometimes, if I was walking near the parade route when the parade was going, and I knew it was close to their float appearing, I’d stop and wait to see and listen to them. They were fantastic. I don’t know what it was about the film version that just didn’t hit with me.

Because of the parade and the various other uses of the songs in Disney activities, I’m of course familiar with Zero to Hero and Go the Distance. In the versions I’ve heard, both are really energetic and peppy and cheery and much more orchestrated. I didn’t find that to be the case in the film. I can sort of understand with Go the Distance (I guess that was Hercules’ “want” song?), but the delivery of the song in the film didn’t really convey what I thought the words were trying to convey. He should be confident that he can in fact go the distance or show a little bit of self-doubt that he’d be able to, or some combination of both, but it just seemed very flat, not conveying any particular emotion at all. I also thought the end title version of the song, sung by Michael Bolton, was a bit odd. Bolton’s delivery of the song was much more angsty, but not in a way that made me feel anything. I’d be curious to hear a version of the song that didn’t have a lot of musical accompaniment, a sort of inspirational pep talk that Hercules gives himself. I think that would be very powerful. Not sure who I’d want to sing that. I do know that my reactions to hearing the songs in the film is tainted by all of my exposure to them away from the film. Don’t know what my thoughts would have been hearing them for the first time as orchestrated in the film.

I think part of my disinterest in the film stems from the fact that I’m not a fan of two of the actors who voice prominent characters, Danny DeVito and James Woods, so having to listen to them so much of the time wasn’t a particularly pleasant experience. Every time Hades was on screen, I kept thinking about Rasputin from "Anastasia", which oddly enough was released the same year as "Hercules", and how I’d have much rather listen to Christopher Lloyd as Rasputin. I was surprised that I wasn’t very impressed with Susan Egan as Megara. I’m more familiar with her as Belle from Broadway’s Beauty and the Beast. I didn’t really care for her character or her characterization, or the vocal choices made for her. She had a bit of a Southern madame in her voice that I wasn’t keen on, and I didn’t think her one song showcased her voice at all.

Since there wasn’t anything in the film that really grabbed my attention, and there were some negatives to me (I really couldn’t get over the missing Hera story point), I don’t expect that I’ll ever watch the movie again. There isn’t anything that I really want to watch more closely at or for or experience again. I wouldn’t refuse to watch it, but I wouldn’t put any effort into doing so. But I’d jump at the chance to watch the parade again.

"The Hunchback of Notre Dame" - Disney animated film review

The next Disney animated movie that I watched was "The Hunchback of Notre Dame". I loved the Festival of Fools show at Disneyland and the stage musical, but I'd never seen the movie. I did know that the movie was different than the book, so I was prepared for that.

I’ve never read the book, so I don’t know the details, but I know the general jist of the story. I also wasn’t particularly interested in the animated film when it came out, so I never saw it. I was introduced to the elements of the film by way of the Festival of Fools show at Disneyland. When I started going to Disneyland regularly, the show had been going on for some time. I met some new friends, some of whom were quite enamoured of the show, so I went with them one time, and I was hooked. It was a terrific production, a lot of fun, a lot to look at, and I love musical theatre. I only saw it for a few months, I think, before the show ended.

That show only represented a small portion of what’s in the film while adding a few elements from the rest of the film so that there’s an ending to the story in the show. Because I know that version of the story and the songs so well, and because I’ve also seen the stage production a few times now, which I also love, and which also more faithfully follows the story of the original novel, I found as I was watching the film that I had a really difficult time judging the movie. Did I like elements because of how it was presented in the Disneyland show or the stage musical or was I enjoying just the film version? Would I have loved the music so much just from watching the movie without already knowing its context in the Disneyland show and the stage production? The songs are fuller and more flushed out in both of the live shows. My favorite song in the story is “God Help the Outcasts”. That song wasn’t in the Disneyland show, so I didn’t hear it until much later, but at first listen, I loved it. I’m not that impressed with the version in the film, and I don’t know that I would have been as drawn to it from that. (I think that song was included in the live show at Walt Disney World (Disney Hollywood Studios, maybe?), but I only saw the show once so don't really remember it.)

After having seen the film, I’m even more amazed that Disney even attempted it. Yes, they’ve taken other stories and modified the original story into a “nicer” version, which they’ve done in this case as well, but there are so many elements that remain that make this a much darker story than the usual Disney animated fare. Yes, villains are evil and threaten innocent people, but Frollo actually kills Quasimodo’s mother and would have killed the child as well if he hadn’t been convinced not to. The subjugation, lies and control that he exerts over Quasi is relentless and ruthless. He even wants Phoebus to burn down the home of innocent people with them trapped inside, which is the final straw that turns Phoebus against him. Frollo is lusting after Esmeralda and hell-bent on destroying her as well. All of those elements seem a bit complicated to explain to younger children, who are usually a significant portion of the intended audience.

A change in the story from the original novel also casts the church in a very different light. In the novel, Frollo is a priest, but in the animated film, he’s a politician / civil servant as Minister of Justice / Judge. I was stunned when I first learned about that particular change and found out what Frollo’s original position was. All of the things he’s doing are bad enough in and of themselves, but as a layman, he’s inherently flawed, and while he crosses way over the line, his zealous fixation on Esmeralda is creepy but at least, to a degree, understandable. I’m not sure how a Minister of Justice has the authority to damn someone to hell, though. However, when you know that Frollo was really a priest, it is so much worse. Yes, priests are still human but are supposed to try to be better, to resist temptation. But for a priest to say that he’s a pious and righteous man, but he’s being bewitched, and it’s not his fault, and it’s all the fault of the woman he’s fixated on? That is absolutely so much worse. The church comes off much better in the animated film since the archdeacon is who saves Quasi’s life and is also who tries to stop Frollo at the end. But in the novel, Frollo as the representative of the church behaves absolutely reprehensibly and is the epitome of the hypocrisy that the church is often accused of.

Which brings us to the song “Hellfire”. I’ve liked the song since I heard snippets of it included in the Disneyland show, and the instrumental version used in fireworks shows and World of Color always makes me happy, especially when it’s accompanied by some fire element. But I didn’t know the whole song, and I’d never really heard the lyrics. OK, yeah, Frollo thinks Esmeralda is evil, so he damns her to hell. No big deal, that happens a lot, right? No. Seriously, no. That’s not all it is. It’s not just, you’re evil, you’re going to hell, end of story. Instead, Frollo tells her she’s evil, but she can be redeemed if she agrees to basically be his concubine. She can either choose to give herself to him for the rest of her life, or he will damn her to hell. WHAT???? Are you kidding me? Bad enough coming from any authority figure, BUT FROM A PRIEST? How are parents explaining THIS song to their kids? I still like the song, but I definitely view it differently now that I know what it’s really about.

The ending of the story is very different from the original novel, as you’d expect the happy Disney ending. Frollo dies, though not really killed by anyone, so no one gets the blame for that. Phoebus and Esmeralda and Quasi are all alive and super happy and are apparently going to get an apartment together. In the novel, Esmeralda dies, and everything ends on a somber note. I think the change in story does a great deal to alter the last snippet of song with the lyrics “what makes a monster and what makes a man”. In the happy ending version, it still makes you think for a moment, but you get caught up in the happy ending, so I think it fades quickly. With Quasi carrying Esmeralda after her death, and knowing about all the evil that Frollo has done, I think that particular phrase takes on greater significance and makes one think more about perception based on the outward appearance.

As for the voice talent:

Tony Jay as Frollo was fantastic. His deep, resonating voice was perfect. I had seen the stage production of the show at the La Jolla Playhouse, where Frollo was remarkably played by Patrick Page. As I was watching the film, I realized how much Patrick Page sounded like Tony Jay does in the film! I didn’t recognize Kevin Kline as Phoebus, but knowing it after the fact, it made sense. I enjoyed his performance. I’m not sure I knew or at least had forgotten that Demi Moore voiced Esmeralda. I was definitely not whelmed by her performance, which was kind of flat and inconsequential. Esmeralda is a spitfire and she defies authority, but none of that comes through in the voice performance.

As far as Clopin, I don't have an independent opinion of him. Yeah, I liked him but that's because I liked Clopin in the Disneyland show. I don't know what I would have thought of him just seeing him in the movie first.

Generally, I enjoyed the film, admittedly partly because I got to listen to the songs I love so much. I’ll have to see it again to see what I think of it because I’ll already be over the surprise of it being different than the versions I’ve seen, so maybe I can focus on the actual film presentation itself.

Oh, and my favorite version of this Hunchback story so far is the production that was at the La Jolla Playhouse. Michael Arden as Quasi, Ciara Renee as Esmeralda, and Patrick Page as Frollo were all absolutely amazing. I’m really sad that version didn’t make it to Broadway.

"The Aristocats" - Disney animated film review

Some of you may know that, even though I'm now a Disney fan, I didn't grow up in a Disney household, so I haven't actually seen many of the classic Disney animated films. Well, I guess now is as good a time as any to remedy that. So it's not a bookclub or a viewing club, but a discussion-generating thread that originated on my Facebook account.

I'm going to watch one Disney animated movie a week, and then every week, I'll post my thoughts on it. Anyone who wants to participate is welcome, and if you have Disney+ or own the movie, you can refresh your memory by watching it again. Or just comment from memory because you've seen it so many times!

I started this several weeks ago, and the first film I started with was "The Aristocats".

I've never known much about this movie, but I assumed it was about ... cats. Right. But the only scenes/clips I've ever seen of it are the band of cats playing jazz, so I always thought it was about upper class musical cats. Hmmm, no.

It only took a little while into the movie for me to figure out that it's a feline version of Lady and the Tramp. I mean Lady/Duchess and Tramp/O'Malley-cat? Yeah, dead giveaway.

Overall, I enjoyed the film. I absolutely loved the backgrounds - such beautiful paintings of Paris and environs. Makes me want to go back even more.

I also really liked how they treated the characterizations of the cats. They had VERY cat-like features and moves and expressions, but when they were doing human-ish things, they still seemed believable and seemed to incorporate their catness (not Katniss) into the activity. I've been watching a lot of cat videos lately, so it was fun to see how wonderfully they recreated the little kittens in animation that long ago.

I was pretty curious about the styling of Thomas. It took me a minute to figure out why he was striking me as a bit odd. There were certain looks of his that kept reminding me of Shere Khan, from the Jungle Book. And then, I realized that they drew him not like the small cats (aka house cats, like Duchess and her kittens), but rather, like the Big Cats, like tigers. At first, I thought it was just a difference between him and the kittens, but then I remembered that Duchess was an adult cat. In one scene with just the two of them together, Duchess has the dainty nose of a house cat, and Thomas has the bigger snout of a tiger. I don't think it's just a male/female thing either, because male house cats also generally have the small nose.

I also thought it was amusing that Thomas was voiced as a suave American who sweeps the upper class French Duchess off her feet, even though she's voiced by a Hungarian. I hadn't known that and was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed Eva Gabor's performance.

And to the kittens. Marie, the sweet little kitten - is an absolute flirt. Oh, wait, no, that's wrong. She's a FLIRT. Wow.

And why does Marie have a British accent?

My favorite kitten was actually Touloose. He was so cute, and I especially liked when he was trying to be puffy. It's so adorable when a little kitty is trying to be menacing by making themselves half an inch taller. And when he tried to hiss and spit, he just ended up drooling.

The third kitten - yeah, don't know his name, couldn't figure out his name no matter how many times they said it, even read his name in the credits and STILL don't and won't remember his name.

I liked the "he's marinated" line about the older male goose. At one point when the three of them were talking, I said to the husband that they were very loud. He replied that geese ARE very loud. Ah, ok.

I liked the movie but I'm not sure how much I'd watch it. Edit together the scenes of the kittens being cute, and yeah, I'd watch that all the time. No surprise there.

My only real criticism of the film - that Siamese cat in the band is pretty offensive, especially when they have him playing the piano with chopsticks. I know, it's a sign of the times, but the way the cat is drawn and the speech affectation - UGH. Thankfully, he has very little screen time.

Oh, I forgot to mention. Maybe they'll do a live action version of The Aristocats like they've been doing with other animated films. We know there's the technology to do live action people cats.