The Disney animated movie that I watched for the first time last week
was "Dumbo". I knew a little bit about the film in that Dumbo was a
baby elephant in a circus who was separated from his mother. There’s
apparently much more to the story.
Having now watched 6 Disney
animated films in as many weeks, I’ve come to the conclusion that all of
these “kids’ movies” contain some very mature themes that aren’t
necessarily easy to explain to kids. I’m finding that I’m having a lot
of trouble watching when people (with “people” intending to mean humans,
animals, creatures, any sentient being) are mean to others, most
especially children (again, with “children” intending to mean humans,
animals, creatures, whatever offspring or tiny being). There is
generally an awful lot of peril involved. Are kids traumatized when
they see these movies? Or is everything ok for them by the time it’s
over because of the happy endings, and they’ve forgotten about all the
scary things that have happened? Or are kids so young at the time they
first see these that they don’t really understand what’s going on in the
story and are only drawn to the cute creatures and pretty colors?
OK, so, to the movie. I liked the storks song as they were all
dropping off the little babies. I was thinking wow, they have really
good aim to know when to release the little bundle at what trajectory to
land precisely where they need to. As I was watching that sequence, I
thought of the Pixar short “Partly Cloudy”, where all babies are created
in the clouds and storks deliver them to their parents. As it turns
out, the creator of the short film, Peter Sohn, apparently was inspired
to make the film because he watched “Dumbo” as a kid and wondered where
the storks got the babies!
Awww, baby hippo! So cute. (Shout out to my friend who likes hippos.)
I really liked the Casey, Jr. segment. Terrific song, really pretty
visuals. And I was marveling the whole time that they were able to
create that attraction at Disneyland. Absolutely inspired and amazing.
I think I had a vague idea that the attraction was linked to “Dumbo”,
but I’m not sure.
We saw the other babies being delivered, and
Mrs. Jumbo (Is there a Mr. Jumbo?) was eagerly awaiting her delivery,
only to be disappointed when none arrives. Turns out, the stork who was
delivering Dumbo was late, or at least had a later call time. The
stork is able to locate Casey, Jr. (I told the husband that I didn’t
know the names of the states are visible when you’re that high up. He
rightly ignored my comment.) and delivers the precious package to a
delighted Mrs. Jumbo.
Oh my goodness. Baby Dumbo is the cutest
thing. He has an ultra version of the expressive baby eyes, and they’re
a brilliant blue to boot. So pretty. I was realizing that unlike some
of the other animated movies (like “Bambi” and “The Lion King”), the
timeframe of this story is so short that Dumbo remains his ever-cute
self since he doesn’t have time to grow up. That makes him even more
endearing, always remaining a baby.
So there’s little cute Dumbo,
and then, there are his EARS. Yep, he has giant ears, each of which is
bigger than his head. Yeah, it looks a bit odd, but it’s not like
they’re deformed or anything, like a pig’s ear that a dog has chewed up.
The reaction to Dumbo’s ears made me think of Rudolph and his bright
shining nose. “Dumbo” was released in 1941, and the original Rudolph
story was published in a booklet in 1939, so it’s possible there was
some influence.
As the entourage arrive at a new town, I was kind
of watching in amazement as all the animals are so happy, happy enough
to even help with putting up the tent that will be their workspace. The
elephants seemed to be doing the majority of the work, with a bit of
help from other animals. I noted that the tigers were not being made to
help with the work, and the husband responded that they would eat
everyone. Hmmm, point taken but still.
Little Dumbo is a hit
with the circus guests, but then of course, some obnoxious boys have to
make fun of him and even go past the ropes and taunt and harass and
abuse poor little Dumbo. Stupid boys. Well, of course, mama Jumbo is
going to get mad - don’t mess with her baby! But no one ever pays
attention to the whole story, and the dangerous “mad elephant” is put in
chains and solitary confinement, away from her little boy. Poor little
baby is all alone, so maybe the other elephants will take care of him,
especially since they’re female? Nope. One calls him a freak and they
make fun of him, this little baby who now has no one to look after him.
The female elephants behave like completely bitchy mean girls, shutting
him out of their circle.
And then, one of my new favorite
characters showed up - Timothy Mouse! I liked him from the very
beginning, with his smart-ass voice and wisecracks, and FINALLY, someone
other than Dumbo’s mother shows some compassion for the poor kid.
Right away, Timothy understands how mean the female elephants are being
to Dumbo, and he sets out for a little revenge by scaring them since
they’re afraid of mice! And Timothy is the one with the idea of giving
Dumbo a bigger and more prominent position in the circus. I do have one
unanswered question about Timothy, though. What does he do? Is he
employed by the circus as another animal act? He’s wearing a ringmaster
costume. Or is he just hanging about, stealing peanuts, and he likes
to dress fancy for no apparent reason?
I loved the term “pyramid
of pachyderms”. That needs to be a band name. Or a restaurant name.
Or something. But as the elephants were assembling their “pyramid” (it
didn’t really look like a pyramid to me) by piling on each other like
cheerleaders in a competition, I kept remarking that I didn’t think
elephants could really do that, and they wouldn’t be able to hold the
weight of another elephant on them, much less multiple elephants.
Again, the husband ignored my comments.
When the elephants fell, I
did worry about them, that they’d get hurt and die. I mean, one
elephant height to fall from is bad enough, but multiple elephant
heights? Yeesh. But they only came away with bumps and bruises and
scrapes. I did laugh when I noticed one elephant had a steak tied over
one eye. But then I stopped feeling sorry for them because they were
again mean to Dumbo and kicked him out of the elephant union, so then
Dumbo was used as part of the clowns act. I am not a fan of clowns.
After that entire sequence, I am still not a fan of clowns.
Ahhh,
Baby Mine. That devastating song that I didn’t even know how
heartbreaking it is. It’s a beautiful sequence, with poor little sad
Dumbo, but Timothy knows what to do to make him feel better. See, I
like Timothy even more! Even though Mrs. Jumbo is caged and chained,
she does her best to comfort her little boy, and Dumbo gets some much
needed love from mama. Awwwww.
The clowns decide that they’re
fantastic contributions to society and don’t have a problem dropping
Dumbo from the top of the Empire State Building (ok, that might be an
exaggeration) because after all, elephants don’t have feelings (that is
most definitely NOT an exaggeration). People suck. And in this case, I
do mean humans - these clowns, the boys who taunted and abused Dumbo
before, and the ringmaster too.
So the clowns were celebrating
and ended up dumping some of the champagne into a giant bucket of water,
which eventually both Dumbo and Timothy drink out of. And they get
DRUNK. Is that possible? I mean, it’s only champagne, and it’s not a
lot, and it’s diluted. Do elephants and mice get drunk from champagne?
I don’t know how old Timothy is, but Dumbo is just a baby. Giving
champagne to the baby, even by accident, is not a good thing. I did
like the sequence where Dumbo and Timothy are blowing bubbles. That was
very cute and well done.
And then, my head exploded a little
bit. Ummm, wait, I’ve seen this segment before, at least parts of it.
You mean the entire weirdo colored elephants section of the prior
incarnation of Fantasmic at Disneyland is from “Dumbo”? I had no idea.
Flabbergasted.
On a different note, that segment reminded me of
heffalumps and woozles from Winnie the Pooh. It appears that the
existence of heffalumps and woozles pre-dates “Dumbo”, but the visual
incarnation of them that we’re familiar with comes later, so I wonder if
they were influenced by this segment in “Dumbo”. They’re both sort of
“fever dreams” influenced by ingestion of an outside substance, kind of
like an absinthe-induced hallucination. My favorite part of this
segment were the pink and purple silhouettes of elephants dancing. I
think that would be a really beautiful cel.
Magpies? Crows? I
think one of them called themselves crows. I really liked them.
They’re hip and musical and fun and a bit mischievous. I’d like to hang
out with them. Without the cigar smoking, though. And they’re
sarcastic and rascally at first, but then they help Dumbo learn to fly!
And then we get to the part of the story that everyone knows, where
Dumbo flies, and he’s a hit, and his mom is released from jail, and they
get a fancy car, and everyone is happy and loves them, now that his
formerly shunned abnormal feature is now suddenly beloved because it’s
serving a useful purpose. Kind of like in Rudolph’s case too. Hmmm. I
kind of expected more after that, so I was surprised the “happily ever
after” was rolled out so quickly, and then it was over.
I did
enjoy the film for the most part, other than the whole “be mean to the
poor little orphan-ish elephant just because he’s a little different”
part. So at the end, when everyone’s happy and cheering for Dumbo and
Mrs. Jumbo, including the female elephants, I immediately said, no, you
don’t get off that easy. Oh sure, now you’re all happy and nice. You
weren’t when it counted. Yeah, I hold grudges. I probably wouldn’t
object to seeing the film again and just enjoy cute little Dumbo and the
parts that I really liked.
And no, I will not watch the recent “live action” remake of this film.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment